Every now and then I decide I'll try and sort out my VoIP setup. And then I give up. Today I tried again. I really didn't think I was aiming that high. I thought I'd start by making my email address work as a SIP address. Seems reasonable, right? I threw in the extra constraints of wanting some security (so TLS, not UDP) and a soft client that would work on my laptop (I have a Grandstream hardphone and would like an Android client as well, but I figure those are the easy cases while the "I have my laptop and I want to remain connected" case is a bit trickier). I had a suitable Internet connected VM, access to control my DNS fully (so I can do SRV records) and time to read whatever HOWTOs required. And oh my ghod the state of the art is appalling.
Let's start with getting a SIP server up and running. I went with repro which seemed to be a reasonably well recommended SIP server to register against. And mostly getting it up and running and registering against it is fine. Until you try and make a TLS SIP call through it (to a sip5060.net test address). Problem the first; the StartCom free SSL certs are not suitable because they don't advertise TLS Client. So I switch to CACert. And then I get bitten by the whole question about whether the common name on the cert should be the server name, or the domain name on the SIP address (it's the domain name on the SIP address apparently, though that might make your SIP client complain).
That gets the SIP side working. Of course RTP is harder. repro looks like it's doing the right thing. The audio never happens. I capitulate at this point, and install Lumicall on my phone. That registers correctly and I can call the sip:email@example.com test number and hear the time. So the server is functioning, it's the client that's a problem. I try the following (Debian/testing):
I'm bored at this point. Can I "dial" my debian.org SIP address from Lumicall? Of course not; I get a "Codecs incompatible" (SIP 488 Not Acceptable Here) response. I have no idea what that means. I seem to have all of the options on Lumicall enabled. Is it a NAT thing? A codec thing? Did I sacrifice the wrong colour of goat?
At some point during this process I get a Skype call from some friends, which I answer. Up comes a video call with them, their newborn, perfect audio, and no hassle. I have a conversation with them that doesn't involve me cursing technology at all. And then I go back to fighting with SIP.
Gunnar makes the comment about Skype creating a VoIP solution 10 years ago when none was to be found. I believe they're still the market leader. It just works. I'm running the Linux client, and they're maintaining it (a little behind the curve, but close enough), and it works for text chat, voice chat and video calls. I've spent half a day trying to get a Free equivalent working and failing. I need something that works behind NAT, because it's highly likely when I'm on the move that's going to be the case. I want something that lets my laptop be the client, because I don't want to rely on my mobile phone. I want my email address to also be my VoIP address. I want some security (hell, I'm not even insisting on SRTP, though I'd like to). And the state of the Open VoIP stack just continues to make me embarrassed.
I haven't given up yet, but I'd appreciate some pointers. And Skype, if you're hiring, drop me a line. ;)
So I recently announced my intention to rejoin the Debian project, having been a member between 2002 & 2011 (inclusive).
In the past I resigned mostly due to lack of time, and what has changed is that these days I have more free time - primarily because my wife works in accident & emergency and has "funny shifts". This means we spend many days and evenings together, then she might work 8pm-8am for three nights in a row, which then becomes Steve-time, and can involve lots of time browsing reddit, coding obsessively, and watching bad TV (currently watching "Lost Girl". Shades of Buffy/Blood Ties/similar. Not bad, but not great.)
My NM-progress can be tracked here, and once accepted I have a plan for my activities:
I believe this will be useful, even though there will be limits - I've no patience for PHP and will just ignore it, along with its ecosystem, for example.
As progress today I reported #754899 / CVE-2014-4978 against Rawstudio, and discussed some issues with ITP: tiptop (the program seems semi-expected to be installed setuid(0), but if it is then it will allow arbitrary files to be truncated/overwritten via "tiptop -W /path/to/file"
And now sleep.
Docker is the new best thing ever.
The technology behind it is pretty cool. It works very well and it's incredibly easy to just make things work.
But that's not the best bit!
My favourite thing about Docker is that it's simple to explain to semi-technical folks and better yet, it's easy to get people enthusiastic about it.
As I've previously mentioned, simplicity is something I aspire to in all things and the fact that "post-technical" [cheers Goran ;)] types get excited about how Docker can be used to break your services down into small components that you thread together makes my life that much easier when I'm trying to "sell" the benefits of doing so.
I have failed at sentence construction. Maybe I need to dockerise [eww] that.
So I've recently posted a few links on Twitter, and I see followers clicking them. But also I see random hits.
Within two minutes I had 15 visitors the first few of which were:IP User-Agent Request 22.214.171.124Twitterbot/1.0;GET /robots.txt 126.96.36.199Twitterbot/1.0;GET /robots.txt 188.8.131.52python-requests/1.2.3 CPython/2.7.2+ Linux/3.0.0-16-virtualHEAD / 184.108.40.206Mozilla/5.0 ();GET / 220.127.116.11Google-HTTP-Java-Client/1.17.0-rc (gzip)HEAD / 18.104.22.168Google-HTTP-Java-Client/1.17.0-rc (gzip)HEAD / 22.214.171.124Twitterbot/1.0;GET /robots.txt 126.96.36.199Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; TweetmemeBot/3.0; +http://tweetmeme.com/)GET / 188.8.131.52MetaURI API/2.0 +metauri.comGET / 184.108.40.206Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Yahoo! Slurp; http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/ysearch/slurp);GET /robots.txt
So what jumps out? The twitterbot makes several requests for /robots.txt, but never actually fetches the page itself which is interesting because there is indeed a prohibition in the supplied /robots.txt file.
A surprise was that both Google and Yahoo seem to follow Twitter links in almost real-time. Though the Yahoo site parsed and honoured /robots.txt the Google spider seemed to only make HEAD requests - and never actually look for the content or the robots file.
In addition to this a bunch of hosts from the Amazon EC2 space made requests, which was perhaps not a surprise. Some automated processing, and classification, no doubt.
Anyway beer. It's been a rough weekend.
Last year I removed all my music from Google Play Music and created my own subSonic server. I really like subSonic but don't use it a huge amount, mostly for syncing some music to my phone prior to going on holiday or business. Therefore, I've made a single one time donation to the project rather than the ongoing monthly usage fee.Installing subSonic on Debian
This is how I install subSonic on Debian Wheezy.Install Tomcat. sudo apt-get install tomcat7 Install subSonic. apt-get install ffmpeg sudo mkdir /var/subsonic sudo chown tomcat7: /var/subsonic sudo wget -c https://github.com/KHresearch/subsonic/releases/download/v4.9-kang/subsonic.war sudo cp subsonic.war /var/lib/tomcat7/webapps
Restart Tomcat.sudo service tomcat7 restart
Login to subSonic by visiting http://server.example.org:8080/subsonic and login with the credentials admin and admin. Make sure you change the password straight away.
Right, that is it. You can stop here and start filling subSonic with your music.subSonic clients
So recently I got into trouble running Redis on a host, because the data no-longer fits into RAM.
As an interim measure I fixed this by bumping the RAM allocated to the guest, but a real solution was needed. I figure there are three real alternatives:
Looking around I found a couple of Redis-alternatives, but I was curious to see how hard it would be to hack something useful myself, as a creative solution.
This evening I spotted Protocol::Redis, which is a perl module for decoding/encoding data to/from a Redis server.
It's a limited implementation which stores data in an SQLite database, and currently has support for:
It isn't hugely fast, but it is fast enough, and it should be possible to use alternative backends in the future.
I suspect I'll not add sets/hashes, but it could be done if somebody was keen.
Is it annoying or not that everyone says SSL Certs and SSL when they really mean TLS?
Does anyone actually mean SSL? Have there been any accidents through people confusing the two?