Planet ALUG

Syndicate content
Planet ALUG - http://planet.alug.org.uk/
Updated: 1 hour 28 min ago

Steve Engledow (stilvoid): Win or lose?

Wed, 23/11/2016 - 01:02

I never paid any attention in art classes. On reflection, I think we had an awful teacher who more or less ignored those of us with no latent talent or interest. I grew up mildly jealous of people I knew who could draw and always wished I was able.

Over the past few years, I've heard several people say that artistic ability is 10% talent and 90% practice and I've considered giving it a go at some point. Recently, we bought some pencils and a pad for my son and this evening, with a glass of wine at hand and some 70s rock on the stereo, I decided to take the plunge and see what horrors I could submit the unwitting page to.

Here's the first thing I've drawn since school:

It was supposed to be my wife. If you know her, you'll know I failed ;)

I focussed too much on the individual features and not enough on the overall shape. The eyes and hair aren't bad (at least they look something like hers), but the mouth and nose are too large and disproportionate - though recognisable.

I decided to try drawing what was in front of me: a ghost-shaped candle holder:

That's a photo by the way, not my drawing ;)

Here's the drawing. I killed the perspective somewhat but at least it's recognisable!

After I'd drawn the ghost, I decided to have another go at my wife while she wasn't paying attention. This one looks more like her but the eyes look as though she's been in a fight and the hair is a tad more Edward Scissorhands than I'd intended.

Overall, I got a better result than I'd expected from my first three attempts at sketching in 20 years. This might turn into a series.

More than willing to receive criticism and advice from people who know what they're doing with a pencil :)

Categories: LUG Community Blogs

Steve Engledow (stilvoid): Win or lose?

Wed, 23/11/2016 - 01:02

I never paid any attention in art classes. On reflection, I think we had an awful teacher who more or less ignored those of us with no latent talent or interest. I grew up mildly jealous of people I knew who could draw and always wished I was able.

Over the past few years, I've heard several people say that artistic ability is 10% talent and 90% practice and I've considered giving it a go at some point. Recently, we bought some pencils and a pad for my son and this evening, with a glass of wine at hand and some 70s rock on the stereo, I decided to take the plunge and see what horrors I could submit the unwitting page to.

Here's the first thing I've drawn since school:

It was supposed to be my wife. If you know her, you'll know I failed ;)

I focussed too much on the individual features and not enough on the overall shape. The eyes and hair aren't bad (at least they look something like hers), but the mouth and nose are too large and disproportionate - though recognisable.

I decided to try drawing what was in front of me: a ghost-shaped candle holder:

That's a photo by the way, not my drawing ;)

Here's the drawing. I killed the perspective somewhat but at least it's recognisable!

After I'd drawn the ghost, I decided to have another go at my wife while she wasn't paying attention. This one looks more like her but the eyes look as though she's been in a fight and the hair is a tad more Edward Scissorhands than I'd intended.

Overall, I got a better result than I'd expected from my first three attempts at sketching in 20 years. This might turn into a series.

More than willing to receive criticism and advice from people who know what they're doing with a pencil :)

Categories: LUG Community Blogs

Steve Engledow (stilvoid): Win or lose?

Wed, 23/11/2016 - 01:02

I never paid any attention in art classes. On reflection, I think we had an awful teacher who more or less ignored those of us with no latent talent or interest. I grew up mildly jealous of people I knew who could draw and always wished I was able.

Over the past few years, I've heard several people say that artistic ability is 10% talent and 90% practice and I've considered giving it a go at some point. Recently, we bought some pencils and a pad for my son and this evening, with a glass of wine at hand and some 70s rock on the stereo, I decided to take the plunge and see what horrors I could submit the unwitting page to.

Here's the first thing I've drawn since school:

It was supposed to be my wife. If you know her, you'll know I failed ;)

I focussed too much on the individual features and not enough on the overall shape. The eyes and hair aren't bad (at least they look something like hers), but the mouth and nose are too large and disproportionate - though recognisable.

I decided to try drawing what was in front of me: a ghost-shaped candle holder:

That's a photo by the way, not my drawing ;)

Here's the drawing. I killed the perspective somewhat but at least it's recognisable!

After I'd drawn the ghost, I decided to have another go at my wife while she wasn't paying attention. This one looks more like her but the eyes look as though she's been in a fight and the hair is a tad more Edward Scissorhands than I'd intended.

Overall, I got a better result than I'd expected from my first three attempts at sketching in 20 years. This might turn into a series.

More than willing to receive criticism and advice from people who know what they're doing with a pencil :)

Categories: LUG Community Blogs

Mick Morgan: if it be your will

Fri, 11/11/2016 - 17:30

A bleak week just got worse. The results of the US Presidential election are, frankly, beyond belief. We now have a xenophobic, racist, misogynistic megalomaniac waiting to move into the White House and become, literally, the most powerful man on earth.

And now Leonard Cohen has died.

Cohen is one of my all time favourite artists. A writer of beautiful poetry and lyrics beyond compare and endowed with a voice capable of moving me to tears. I cry now because that voice is silenced.

In the mid eighties he wrote “If it be your will” which starts:

If it be your will
That I speak no more
And my voice be still
As it was before
I will speak no more
I shall abide until
I am spoken for
If it be your will

This year he wrote in “You want it darker

If You are the dealer, I’m out of the game
If You are the healer, I’m broken and lame
If Thine is the glory, then mine must be the shame
You want it darker – we kill the flame.
Magnified, sanctified is your holy name
Vilified, crucified in the human frame
A million candles burning for the help that never came
You want it darker – Hineni, Hineni, I’m ready, my Lord.

Now he is gone, in the same week the US voted a dangerous buffoon to the Presidency. If there be a God, he has a cruel sense of humour. The world has just got darker.

Categories: LUG Community Blogs

Chris Lamb: Awarded Core Infrastructure Initiative grant for Reproducible Builds

Fri, 11/11/2016 - 17:04

I'm delighted to announce that I have been awarded a grant from the Core Infrastructure Initiative (CII) to fund my previously-voluntary work on Reproducible Builds.

Whilst anyone can inspect the source code of free software for malicious flaws, most software is distributed pre-compiled to end users. The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to permit verification that no flaws have been introduced — either maliciously or accidentally — during this compilation process by promising identical results are always generated from a given source, thus allowing multiple third-parties to come to a consensus on whether a build was compromised.

I'd like to sincerely thank the CII, not only for their material support but also for their recognition of my existing contributions. I am looking forward to working with my co-grantees towards fulfilling our shared goal.

You can read the CII's press release here.

Categories: LUG Community Blogs

Chris Lamb: Core Infrastructure Initiative grant for Reproducible Builds

Fri, 11/11/2016 - 17:01

I'm delighted to announce that I have been awarded a grant from the Core Infrastructure Initiative (CII) to fund my previously-voluntary work on Reproducible Builds.

Whilst anyone can inspect the original source code of free software for malicious flaws, most GNU/Linux distributions provide pre-compiled software to end users. The motivation behind the Reproducible Builds effort is to allow verification that no flaws have been introduced — either maliciously or accidentally — during this compilation process by promising identical binary packages are always generated from a given source.

I'd like to sincerely thank the CII, not only for their material support but also for their recognition of my existing contributions. I am looking forward to working with my co-grantees towards fulfilling our shared goal.

Press release.

Categories: LUG Community Blogs